Tuesday, August 3, 2010

"You'll Find Them Both In The Grand Canyon At Sundown"

“You'll Find Them Both In The

Grand Canyon At Sundown”





Kenneth E. Reynolds

August 3, 2010



Author Note



Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Kenneth E. Reynolds,

E-mail: janetandkenneth@yahoo.com









“You'll Find Them Both In The

Grand Canyon At Sundown”



It really doesn’t really matter what I believe. It really doesn’t matter what you believe. What does matter is that we all agree to disagree and have respect for our fellow man and woman.

Growing up in a modest home in Detroit, Michigan we went to a Christian Science Church because that is the church my father was brought up in.



Then I reached the dating age and was introduced to several other types of churches. If my girlfriend was a Baptist, I went to a Baptist Church. If she was Episcopalian then I went to an Episcopalian Church. This trend continued into my marriage. My wife was a Methodist so I became a Methodist. When I joined the Army and was assigned to Redstone Arsenal, Alabama my wife and I rented a mobile home from a Pentecostal Minister and considering we did not have a car at the time, he invited us to his church and provided the transportation. My second wife was a Catholic so I attended the Catholic Church.

After my second marriage failed, I decided to become an Atheist. I mean why not? Nothing else worked and I really had a hard time believing that if there is only one God and the Roman Catholics believe they have the mother church, where did all of these other churches and religions come from?

One thing does fascinate me about religion though. Whether you believe in the Big Bang theory or Creationism don’t you find it ironic that they both started out with nothing?

• The Big Bang is not an explosion of matter moving outward to fill an empty universe. Instead, space itself expands with time everywhere and increases the physical distance between two comoving points.

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang)







God createth Heaven and Earth, and all things therein, in six days.

1:1. In the beginning God created heaven, and earth.

1:2. And the earth was void and empty, and darkness was upon the face

of the deep; and the spirit of God moved over the waters.

1:3. And God said: Be light made. And light was made.

1:4. And God saw the light that it was good; and he divided the light

from the darkness.

1:5. And he called the light Day, and the darkness Night; and there was

evening and morning one day.

(http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext99/1drvb10.txt)

My children were also allowed to choose the path that they wished to follow. Therefore one is a Buddhist, one pretty much believes in my philosophy, of no deity, one is Jehovah Witness, and one is a Wicca.

I am a serious believer in diversity. Especially religious beliefs, age, disability, ethnicity, race or sexual orientation. Just to mention a few. Yes, I am an atheist but I try to place everyone on a level playing field and respect their cultural beliefs and values.

When I started out on this quest of world religions, I had no idea that I would be involved in more religions that I could possibly comprehend. So, I decided to narrow my research down to those churches that I have touched my life, which I think will be more than sufficient to see the similarities and differences of different religions…even those that I have some knowledge of.,





So let’s start at my beginning and see why I chose to become an Atheist.

About Christian Science

Core Beliefs

Christian Scientists believe in one, infinite God who is All and all-good. They believe that God is not distant and unknowable, but that God is all-encompassing and always present, and that each individual is loved by God, cared for by Him, and made in God’s image—spiritual, not material.

Christian Scientists believe in the Bible and in Christ Jesus as the Son of God, or promised Messiah. And they believe that Jesus’ teachings and healing work expressed scientific Christianity, or the application of the laws of God—laws which are still practical and provable today, by anyone, anywhere. Christian Scientists consider the Commandments, as well as Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount, to be central to their lives and practice of Christianity.

Above all, Christian Scientists believe in the saving, healing power of God’s love—that no one is beyond redemption, that no problem is too entrenched or overwhelming to be addressed and healed. In other words, Christian Scientists don’t believe that salvation occurs at some point in the future, but that the presence of God’s goodness can be experienced here and now—and by everyone.

One of the best ways to learn more about Christian Science is to explore the Christian Science textbook, Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures.

The Tenets of Christian Science, Science and Health, pages 496–497

(http://christianscience.com/beliefs.html)

Baptist



From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Baptists are a group of Christian denominations, churches, and individuals who subscribe to a theology of believer's baptism (as opposed to infant baptism), salvation through faith alone, Scripture alone as the rule of faith and practice, and the autonomy of the local church. They generally practice baptism by immersion (as opposed to affusion or sprinkling) and disavow authoritative creeds. Baptist churches are Protestant, and some churches or individuals further identify with evangelicalism or fundamentalism. Baptists recognize two ministerial offices, pastor-elders and deacons, but not bishops. Diverse from their beginning, those identifying as Baptists today differ widely from one another in what they believe, how they worship, their attitudes toward other Christians, and their understanding of what is important in Christian discipleship.[1]

Historians trace the earliest Baptist church back to 1609 in Amsterdam, with English Separatist John Smyth as its pastor.[2] In accordance with his reading of the New Testament, he rejected baptism of infants and instituted baptism only of believing adults.[3] Baptist practice spread to England. Here, the General Baptists considered Christ's atonement to extend to all people, while the Particular Baptists believed that it extended only to the elect.[4] In 1639, Roger Williams established the first Baptist congregation in the American colonies.[4] In the mid-1700s, the Great Awakening increased Baptist growth.[4] Baptist missionaries have spread the church to every continent.[3]

The Baptist World Alliance reports more than 37 million members in more than 150,000 congregations.[5] In 2002, there were over 100 million Baptists and Baptistic group members worldwide and over 33 million in North America.[3] The largest Baptist association is the Southern Baptist Convention, with over 16 million members.[4]

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baptists)



What is the Episcopalian Church and what do Episcopalians believe?



Question: "What is the Episcopalian Church and what do Episcopalians believe?"



Answer: The Episcopal Church, USA (ECUSA) is the official organization of the Anglican Communion in the United States. Most of the earliest colonists to America were Anglican Puritans, and the Anglican Church became the established church of Virginia, Maryland, New York, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia during the colonial period. After the American Revolution, the Anglican Church in America formed an independent body in 1789 and called it the Protestant Episcopal Church. On their website, the ECUSA is described as a “middle way between Roman Catholic and Protestant traditions.” Like the Catholic Church, the Episcopal Church upholds the sacraments as essential to salvation, and like Protestant churches, it denies the supremacy of the Pope as the vicar of Christ on earth.



The word “Episcopal” comes from the Greek word that is usually translated “bishop,” and points to the church's understanding that a bishop is the primary ruler of the church. Under the Episcopal form of government, the bishop's authority is equal to that of the Apostles and follows a line of succession by the laying on of hands in ordination. Priests come under the authority of the bishops and are responsible for the teaching and administration of the local churches. Throughout the history of the ECUSA, their doctrine and practice have been generally in line with that of the Anglican Church.



Over the years, the Episcopal Church has gradually accepted changes that have strained its ties with the Anglican Communion and have even resulted in schisms. In 1873, the Reformed Episcopal Church was formed over disagreements about the freedom to worship with non-Anglicans. In 2006, Jefferts Schori was elected as the Presiding Bishop of the ECUSA, the first woman to hold that office. That election strained ties with the Anglican Communion, as no other church body recognizes the ordination of women as bishops. Bishop Schori has made history in other ways, as well. While the Bishop of Nevada, she allowed for the blessing of same-sex unions in her diocese. When openly gay Bishop Gene Robinson was examined for qualification to continue in ministry, Bishop Schori voted to confirm him. At the 2009 meeting of the House of Bishops, over which Schori presided, that body voted that “any ordained ministry” should be open to gay and lesbian members as long as they were in a committed relationship. As a result of these positions on homosexuals in the church, nearly 700 dissenting parishes have formed the Anglican Church in North America, which has been recognized in full communion by the Anglican Churches of Nigeria and Uganda, which represent about 1/3 of all Anglicans worldwide. Several dioceses have also severed ties or threatened to sever ties with the ECUSA over that same issue.



Though there may be genuine disciples of Christ within the Episcopal Church, it seems that the general characteristic of the church is like the people that Ezekiel ministered to: “My people come to you, as they usually do, and sit before you to listen to your words, but they do not put them into practice. With their mouths they express devotion, but their hearts are greedy for unjust gain. Indeed, to them you are nothing more than one who sings love songs with a beautiful voice and plays an instrument well, for they hear your words but do not put them into practice” (Ezekiel 33:31-32).



Recommended Resource: Complete Guide to Christian Denominations: Understanding the History, Beliefs, and Differences by Ron Rhodes.



(http://gotquestions.org/Episcopalians.html)





United Methodist Church

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



The United Methodist Church (UMC) is a Methodist Christian denomination which is both mainline and evangelical. Founded in 1968 by the union of the The Methodist Church and the Evangelical United Brethren Church, the UMC traces its roots back to the holiness revival movement of John and Charles Wesley within the Church of England.[6][7][8] As such, the church's theological orientation is decidedly Wesleyan.[9] It contains both liturgical and evangelical elements.[10][11]

In the United States, it ranks as the largest mainline denomination, the second largest Protestant church after the Southern Baptist Convention, and the third largest Christian denomination. As of 2007, worldwide membership was about 12 million: 8.0 million in the United States and Canada,[12] 3.5 million in Africa, Asia and Europe.[13] It is a member of the World Council of Churches, the World Methodist Council, and other religious associations.

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Methodist_Church)

















What is a Pentecostal church?

From the book, ‘What People Ask About The Church’ by Dale A. Robbins

A Pentecostal church takes its name from the Spirit's outpouring which occurred on the day of Pentecost in Acts 2:1-4. The primary distinction of a Pentecostal church is the belief that Christians can receive the same experience as the 120 did, of being baptized with the Holy Spirit, evidenced by speaking in other tongues. In this same vein, the Pentecostal believes in the present day operation of spiritual gifts such as miracles, healing, prophecy, and other supernatural manifestations described in 1 Corinthians 12. They generally follow a similar form of liturgy to that found in most evangelical churches, and they place high value on praise and worship.

A Pentecostal church generally identifies with the long standing history, traditions and theological views of the Pentecostal movement which began to emerge throughout the U.S. at the turn of the 20th century. The origins of the movement are usually associated with a band of believers led by minister, Charles F. Parham. In a Bible school in Topeka, Kansas, students and teachers, along with Parham, researched the book of Acts, searching for the source of the Apostle's great power and success. They all concluded that it was because of the events that began with the Day of Pentecost. After a thorough review of Acts 2,8,9,10, and 19, they concluded that the same experience was available to them. On New Year's eve 1900, the first student was filled with the spirit and spoke in tongues. Then on January 3rd, others including Parham received, igniting a rapid growing movement. The famed 1906 revival of the Azusa Street mission in Los Angeles was a derivative of the events in Topeka. From there, it spread through the U.S., Canada and abroad.

The Pentecostals have long been known and respected for their great emphasis on evangelism and foreign missions. Some of the more well known Pentecostal fellowships are: The Assemblies of God (of Springfield, MO) with 11,689 U.S. churches, The Church of God in Christ with 15,300, The Church of God (of Cleveland, TN) with 5,776, and The Foursquare Church with 1,558. In all, there are 43,727 U.S. churches affiliated with Pentecostal denominations, with hundreds more of independent status.¹

Within the ranks of those who identify themselves as Pentecostals, there are small sects which are known for more extreme or even bizarre views. Some practice handling of snakes, or others of a Unitarian theology insist that only those who speak with tongues can be saved. These unorthodox beliefs are not embraced by the large body of Pentecostal churches or denominations, however the fanaticism of this small group of radicals has sometimes generated an inaccurate stereotype of all Pentecostals which has been exploited by tabloid TV news shows and so forth.

(http://www.victorious.org/chur45.htm)



Catholic Church

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



The Catholic Church, also known as the Roman Catholic Church, is the world's largest Christian church, with more than a billion members.[1] Its leader is the Pope who is head of the College of Bishops. A communion of the Western church and 22 Eastern Catholic churches, it comprised a total of 2,795 dioceses in 2008.[2] The Church defines its mission as spreading the gospel of Jesus Christ, administering the sacraments and exercising charity. It operates social programs and institutions throughout the world including schools, universities, hospitals, missions, shelters and charities.[3]

The Church teaches that it is the "One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church" founded by Jesus Christ, that its bishops are consecrated successors of his apostles and that the Pope as the successor of St. Peter possesses a universal primacy of jurisdiction and pastoral care. Church doctrines have been defined through 21 ecumenical councils and the Church maintains that by guidance of the Holy Spirit, it can define its teachings on faith and morals infallibly under specific conditions.[4][note 1][5] Catholic beliefs are based on the Holy Bible and Sacred Tradition interpreted by the Church's teaching authority and detailed in the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Catholic worship is called the liturgy, the central component of which is the Eucharist.

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church)









Atheism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Atheism, in a broad sense, is the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.[1] In a narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities.[2] Most inclusively, atheism is simply the absence of belief that any deities exist.[3] Atheism is contrasted with theism,[4] which in its most general form is the belief that at least one deity exists.[5][6]

The term atheism originated from the Greek ἄθεος (atheos), meaning "without gods", which was applied with a negative connotation to those thought to reject the gods worshipped by the larger society. With the spread of freethought, skeptical inquiry, and subsequent increase in criticism of religion, application of the term narrowed in scope. The first individuals to identify themselves as "atheist" appeared in the 18th century.[7] Today, about 2.3% of the world's population describes itself as atheist, while a further 11.9% is described as nonreligious.[8] Between 64% and 80%[9] of Japanese describe themselves as atheists, agnostics, or non-believers.[10] According to a poll by Der Spiegel magazine, 45% of Germans believe in God, and a quarter in Jesus Christ.[11] The percentage of such persons in European Union member states ranges as low as single digits in Malta, Poland, Romania, Cyprus and some other countries, and up to 85% in Sweden, 80% in Denmark, 72% in Norway, and 60% in Finland.[10]

Atheists tend to lean towards skepticism regarding supernatural claims, citing a lack of empirical evidence.[citation needed] Common rationales for not believing in any deity include the problem of evil, the argument from inconsistent revelations, and the argument from nonbelief. Other arguments for atheism range from the philosophical to the social to the historical. Although some atheists tend toward secular philosophies such as humanism,[12] rationalism, and naturalism,[13] there is no one ideology or set of behaviors to which all atheists adhere.[14]

In Western culture, atheists are frequently assumed to be exclusively irreligious or unspiritual.[15] However, atheism also figures in certain religious and spiritual belief systems, such as Jainism, some forms of Buddhism that do not advocate belief in gods,[16] and Hinduism that holds atheism to be valid but difficult to follow spiritually.[17]

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism)

Buddhism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Buddhism is a religion and philosophy encompassing a variety of traditions, beliefs and practices, largely based on teachings attributed to Siddhartha Gautama, commonly known as the Buddha (Pāli/Sanskrit "the awakened one"). The Buddha lived and taught in the northeastern Indian subcontinent some time between the 6th and 4th centuries BCE.[2] He is recognized by adherents as an awakened teacher who shared his insights to help sentient beings end suffering (or dukkha), achieve nirvana, and escape what is seen as a cycle of suffering and rebirth.

Two major branches of Buddhism are recognized: Theravada ("The School of the Elders") and Mahayana ("The Great Vehicle"). Theravada—the oldest surviving branch—has a widespread following in Sri Lanka and Southeast Asia, and Mahayana is found throughout East Asia and includes the traditions of Pure Land, Zen, Nichiren Buddhism, Tibetan Buddhism, Shingon, Tendai and Shinnyo-en. In some classifications Vajrayana, a subcategory of Mahayana, is recognized as a third branch. While Buddhism remains most popular within Asia, both branches are now found throughout the world. Various sources put the number of Buddhists in the world at over a billion followers and possibly as many as 1.5 billion or 1.6 billion followers[3][4][5], making it one of the world's largest religions and possibly the second largest religion if upper estimates are accurate. Low estimates of Buddhism tend to come from sources that exclude Chinese Buddhists and refuse to acknowledge that one can combine Buddhism with other beliefs such as Hinduism in Nepal, Jainism in India, Taoism in Chinese populations, primal-indigenous beliefs in Burma and Laos, and Shintoism in Japan.

Buddhist schools vary significantly on the exact nature of the path to liberation, the importance and canonicity of various teachings and scriptures, and especially their respective practices.[6] The foundations of Buddhist tradition and practice are the Three Jewels: the Buddha, the Dharma (the teachings), and the Sangha (the community).[7][8] Taking "refuge in the triple gem" has traditionally been a declaration and commitment to being on the Buddhist path and in general distinguishes a Buddhist from a non-Buddhist.[9] Other practices may include following ethical precepts, support of the



monastic community, renouncing conventional living and becoming a monastic, meditation (this category includes mindfulness), cultivation of higher wisdom and discernment, study of scriptures, devotional practices, ceremonies, and in the Mahayana tradition, invocation of buddhas and bodhisattvas.

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism)



Beliefs and practices of Jehovah's Witnesses

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



The beliefs and practices of Jehovah's Witnesses are based on the Bible teachings of its founder, Charles Taze Russell and his successors, Joseph Franklin Rutherford and Nathan Homer Knorr. Since 1976 they have also been based on decisions made at closed meetings of the religion's Governing Body.[1][2] These teachings are disseminated through The Watchtower magazine and other publications of Jehovah's Witnesses, and at conventions and congregation meetings.

Jehovah's Witnesses teach that the present age of human existence is about to be terminated with the direct intervention of God, who will use Jesus Christ to fully establish his heavenly government over earth, destroying existing human governments and non-Witnesses,[3][4] and creating a cleansed society of true worshipers. They see their mission as primarily evangelical (disseminating "good news"), proselytizing to as many converts as possible in the remaining time before Armageddon.[5][6] All members of the religion are expected to take an active part in preaching what they refer to as "the truth".[7]

They endeavor to remain separate from secular society, which is regarded as a place of moral contamination and under the control of Satan the Devil, refusing any political and military activity and limiting social contact with non-Witnesses.[8] Members practice a strict moral code, forbidding adultery, premarital sex and homosexuality. Drug abuse, smoking and excessive consumption of alcohol are prohibited, as are blood transfusions.[9] Discipline within congregations is maintained by a system of judicial committees, which have the power to expel members who breach organizational rules and demand their shunning by other Witnesses.[10] The threat of shunning also serves to deter other members from dissident behavior.[11][12]

Watch Tower Society publications teach that Jehovah's Witnesses alone represent true Christianity and for that reason they refuse all ecumenical relations with other religious denominations.[13] Members are expected to attend all congregation meetings, as well as regular large-scale conventions, which are highly structured and based on material from Watch Tower publications.[14]

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beliefs_and_practices_of_Jehovah's_Witnesses)



Wicca

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Wicca (pronounced [ˈwɪkə]) is a Neopagan religion and a form of modern witchcraft. It is often referred to as Witchcraft or the Craft[1] by its adherents, who are known as Wiccans or Witches. Its disputed origins lie in England in the early 20th century,[2] though it was first popularised during the 1950s by Gerald Gardner, a retired British civil servant, who at the time called it the "witch cult" and "witchcraft", and its adherents "the Wica".[3] From the 1960s the name of the religion was normalised to "Wicca".[4]

Wicca is typically a duotheistic religion, worshipping a Goddess and a God, who are traditionally viewed as the Triple Goddess and Horned God. These two deities are often viewed as being facets of a greater pantheistic Godhead, and as manifesting themselves as various polytheistic deities. Nonetheless, there are also other theological positions within the Craft, ranging from monotheism to atheism. Wicca also involves the ritual practice of magic, largely influenced by the ceremonial magic of previous centuries, often in conjunction with a liberal code of morality known as the Wiccan Rede, although this is not adhered to by all Witches. Another characteristic of the Craft is the celebration of seasonally based festivals known as Sabbats, of which there are usually eight in number annually.

There are various different denominations within Witchcraft, which are referred to as traditions. Some, such as Gardnerian and Alexandrian Wicca, follow in the initiatory lineage of Gardner; these are often collectively termed British Traditional Wicca, and many of their practitioners consider the term "Wicca" to apply only to these lineaged traditions. Others, such as Cochrane's Craft, Feri and the Dianic tradition, take primary influence from other figures and may not insist on any initiatory lineage. Some of these do not use the term "Wicca" at all, instead preferring to be referred to only as "Witchcraft", while others believe that all traditions can be considered "Wiccan".[5][6]

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicca)

Like I stated in the beginning of this essay, It doesn’t matter what I believe in but, I would like to borrow from one of my favorite song writers, Bob Dylan when he wrote Last Thoughts on Woody Guthrie:

“You can either go to the church of your choice

Or you can go to Brooklyn State Hospital

You'll find God in the church of your choice

You'll find Woody Guthrie in Brooklyn State Hospital

And though it's only my opinion

I may be right or wrong

You'll find them both

In the Grand Canyon

At sundown”

Dylan, B. (1963, April 12). Bob dylan. Retrieved from http://www.bobdylan.com/#/songs/last-thoughts-woody-guthrie

And that my friends makes as much sense to me as being religious.







References Page



Atheism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism



Baptist http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baptists



Buddhism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism



Big Bang http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

Catholic Church http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church

Christian Science http://christianscience.com/beliefs.html

Dylan, B. (1963, April 12). Bob dylan. Retrieved from http://www.bobdylan.com/#/songs/last-thoughts-woody-guthrie

Episcopalian http://gotquestions.org/Episcopalians.html

Holy Bible http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext99/1drvb10.txt

Jehovah’s Witness http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beliefs_and_practices_of_Jehovah's_Witnesses

Pentecostal http://www.victorious.org/chur45.htm

United Methodist Church http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Methodist_Church

Wicca http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicca

Saturday, July 17, 2010

Religious Justification for War Changes Over Time

Religious Justification for War Changes Over Time

Religious Justification for War


by Rit Nosotro

Change Over Time essay

In the West, how did the cause for “Just War” shift from religion as being the only just cause for going to war, to religion being the only unacceptable cause for going to war?



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Thesis: Although the West has given up the idea of going to war for religious reasons, it reacts with aggressive support for Islam to compensate for the fact that Muslim's instigate most of the religious motivated violence in today's world.



Summary: As the Roman Catholic Church gained political power from Charlemagne up through the Crusades, the main just cause for a war was a religious one. However, following the religious wars set in motion by the protestant reformation, Christianity began to reform culture as it spread across Europe. As secularism gained a foothold in the West, war was decreasingly waged for religious reasons. Conversely, in the Islamic world, aggressive calls for Jihad (Holy War) against Jewish Israel and Christian America have brought on defensive wars against well organized Muslim attackers and those Islamic states that support them.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Religious war is as old as Cain killing Able out of jealousy of an acceptable sacrifice. Why do people go to war? In the times of the Biblical Judges where “everyone did as he saw fit”, battles and blood feuds raged. Superstitions and animism lent religious support for the pagan people in Europe to be in near constant warfare up to the Roman conquest. After the fall of Rome, the subsequent prideful warrior cultures went to war for a host of varying reasons that stemmed from religious conflict, greed, revenge or punitive measures.



Yet, despite this chaos, the Roman Catholic Church continued winning converts throughout Europe - and not a moment too late. The violent advance of Islam across northern Africa, up through Spain was finally checked in 732 in France. By 800 AD, Charlemagne was the first king to be crowned by the Pope and in the process cause his entire region to accept Catholic doctrines. From the time Charlemagne had been sanctioned by the pope to the strong papal servants of Ferdinand and Isabella, royalty had used its resources to take back the Iberian peninsula from the Muslims. After seven centuries of religious war the turning point came in 1492 when Christians finally took back Granada from Muslims.



In the midst of that reconquest, Vikings had raided everywhere their boats and swords could reach. But they too accepted Christianity. When the Normans landed in France, they settled down and took the religion of the land as their own. Yet feudalistic battles were often the norm rather than the exception. The Pope outlawed fighting during certain days of the week in what he called God’s Truce and God’s Peace.1 Given the culture of knights trained for battle, with no just cause to exercise their deadly skills, it was only a matter of time before the stage was set for a broader defensive war against the Muslims who had taken control of the Holy Land from Christian settlers and pilgrims.



Perhaps the pope was truly grieved at the Muslims who had invaded the Holy Land. Or perhaps the Pope saw his political solution to stop the in-fighting of Europeans, and simultaneously expand Christendom, and thus his power.2 Pope Urban II launched the first crusade in 1095. Monarchs and people from every nation and place in Europe answered this call to a holy war for the Holy Land. His priests preached of the great rewards in heaven for those who would defend the place of Christ’s birth.3 Pilgrimage in the Middle Ages and veneration of relics was a strong force in Roman Catholicism.



When the Catholic Crusades got out of control, with the sacking of Constantinople, the massacring of Jews and Muslims, and eventually being driven from the Middle East in disgrace, the wars of Europe took a different twist. Although wars were mostly political struggles, they almost always included religious overtones. By the mid 16th century, when the Reformation took place, the Catholic rulers began to wage war on those who were Protestants. For the next two hundred or so years there was a constant struggle in Europe between Protestants and Catholics.



After America became independent from the Anglican Church, and the French Revolution rebelled against religion in response to the centuries4 of French Catholic attacks against Huguenots on warfare in France, the West lost the taste for religion as a reason for war. During the American Civil War both sides claimed the moral high ground regarding slavery and obedience to governments established by God.



The Imperial wars of Britain were all motivated by profit. Although many Christians in Britain felt that they had a moral right, even obligation under "The White Man's Burden", to rule the world, they didn’t claim their wars to be primarily religious ones. In fact, it was pressure from Christians in parliament that brought an end to Britain's greed driven Opium Wars against China. Within the twentieth century the west fought WWI and WWII, both which were propagandized as moral duties, but not as religious wars. Although Reagan won the Cold War against the "Evil Empire" of the USSR, only a minority viewed it as a struggle between godless communism and lovers of God. The only truly religious wars were fought were between Shiite and Sunni Muslims, in the Iran-Iraq war that killed at least 10 million, and the repeated failed attempts by Muslim nations to wage genocide against the Jewish state of Israel. Islamic Jihad, or religious holy war, continues to be a theme that targets not just the Christians of Darfur in Sudan, and the "great Satan" of America, but also moderate governments in Muslim dominated countries. Even Saudi Arabia has Muslim Terrorists on their list of most wanted criminals. President Bush proclaimed that Christians are "not at war with Islam" even through nearly 100% of global terrorism is implemented by Muslims.



The schools of the west have denounced the atrocities committed in the Crusades, and taught that reason is above religion. This has become so indoctrinated into the western culture that when attacked by Islamic terrorists (9/11), the response in America was the promotion of Islam in public education and more tolerance curriculum. Religious war has moved from the point that the only acceptable war was one with a Pope’s blessing, to become the most despicable type of war - as far as the West is concerned. Thus, the west reached the point where the only reason which is totally unjustifiable for going to war is a religious one, but this has brought it into awkward conflict when continuously attacked by Muslim terrorists. In 2003, US General Boykin, was clobbered by the U.S. media and the world at large for saying that Islamic militants hate "America because we're a Christian nation, because our foundation and our roots are Judeo-Christians. ... And the enemy is a guy named Satan.”5



Muslims have used religion as a means for expansion since the 7th century, fighting jihads as they entered new lands. Muslim expansion continues under the flag of their "peaceful" religion. Hamas, Hezbollah, Al Qaeda, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad are religious driven organizations that find government support from Iran, Syria, and Sudan.



Commentary:

The Hebrews had gained their homeland through following God’s orders to invade a country and kill the sinful inhabitants who followed a religion that required the burning of infants on the arms of Baal. Cortez felt justified in putting an end to the Aztec religion of human sacrifice, but it was small pox that wiped out the that culture of death. According to secular historians, perhaps the most brutal religious based slaughter in the history of the world occurred when Islam overran northern India and put to tortuous death millions of Hindu idol worshipers. Islamic Iran pursues the nuclear bomb with the stated purpose of wiping Jewish Israel off the map. The fact of religious based war continues despite the wishful thinking of atheistic and liberal politicians who would rather put their head in the sand and pretend that humanity has evolved beyond religious causes for war. The millenniums old battle between good and evil, light and darkness, did not end just because of the vogue of political correctness and post modern revisionist history. The US army can only slow, not stop, Islamic terrorism by using guns more than ideas. In an ideological religious war, the weapons used against the west are manufactured in mosques, websites, and Islamic schools. The pen is still more powerful than the sword. Refusing to acknowledge the religious basis of the "War on Terror", will be to eliminate the most effective weapon - Truth.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Quick Quiz:



1. Which king was the first to be crowned by the Pope?

a) Charlemagne

b) Henry VIII

c) Louis XIV

d) Elvis or B.B.



2. Knights readily answered the call to a Crusade, because they were frustrated by

a) Vikings becoming Christians

b) Hamas, Hezbollah, and Al Qaeda, trying to bomb Israel off the map.

c) repetitive days of "God’s Peace" or "God’s Truce"

d) America's liberal left blaming American intolerance for the 9/11 attacks



3. Which two religious groups warred in Europe following the Crusades?

a) British Catholics and Irish Protestants

b) Sunnis and Shintos

c) Roman Catholics and French Huguenots

d) Environmental Lutherans and Gaia Methodists



4. What is the best example of the modern opposition of religious support for a war?

a) The French refusal to help the Iraqis become a viable democracy.

b) The way Obama claimed Bush went to war for the wrong reasons.

c) The way the media criticized General Boykin for his statements.

d) The Iman's plea for more children to put on bomb belts against Israeli citizens.





1.a 2.c 3.c 4.c





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Endnotes:

1 Dr. Michel Calvo. “Sovereignty to G-d? Legal Analysis and Implications” October 17, 2000, (September 23, 2004)



2John Sloan, “Crusades” (September 23, 2004)



3Gerhard Rempel, “The Crusades” September 27, 2004



4 C.T. Iannuzzo, “The Wars of Religion” September 27, 2004.



5 “Rumsfeld Defends General Who Commented on War and Satan” Friday, October 17, 2003 September 27, 2004.





Additional information about



Disclaimer:

The above essay was donated to hyperhistory.net.

Kindly inform ritnosotro@gmail.com of inaccuracies or plagiarism.



Post a link to this essay,

a great essay

on your blog or website :

http://www.hyperhistory.net/apwh/essays/cot/t0w26religiouswar.htm
 

Saturday, July 10, 2010

It's Your Right

This information was obtained from the VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System. Even if you are not interested in this information at this time, you may want share it with your family.  I hope this information is helpful to you.


What is an Advance Directive?

An Advance Directive is a document that helps your doctors and family members understand your wishes and choices about healthcare. It can help them decide about treatments if you are unconscious or too weak to talk.  An Advance Directive can be:
  1. A Durable Power of Attorney for Healthcare and / or
  2. A Living Will.
What is a Durable Power of Attorney for
Healthcare?

A Durable Power of Attorney for Healthcare allows you to choose a person to act on your behalf to see that your wishes are carried out only if you become unable to make your own decisions.

This person may be:
  1. Your spouse
  2. An adult child over the age of 18
  3. A close relative
  4. A trusted friend
  5. Your attorney
  6. Your minister, priest, or rabbi
  7. Any person you trust to act on your behalf
What is a Living Will?

A Living Will contains written instructions that tell your family and doctor what kinds of treatments you would or wouldn't want if you became ill and couldn't decide for yourself.  It clearly shows your own beliefs and values about the medical treatment and care you want for yourself.

A Living Will clearly shows your own beliefs and values about medical treatment and care you want for yourself.

Who can sign a Durable Power of Attorney for
Healtcare and/or Living Will?

Anyone over the age of 18 is of sound mind (competent) can sign a Durable Power of Attorney for Healthcare and /or Living Will.

Can I still make my own choices and decisions about my healthcare once I have an Advance Directive?

Yes!  You have the right to make your own healthcare decisions as long as you are able to do so.

When does an Advance Directive take effect?

Your Advance Directive becomes effective only when you are not able to express your own choices or own healthcare decisions.

What situations and decisions do people commonly face with regards to health care decisions?
  1. If you are unconscious, in a coma, or in a persistent vegetative state and there is little or no chance of recovery.
  2. If you have permanent severe brain damage (for example, severe dementia) that makes you unable to make healthcare decisions.
  3. If you have permanent condition that makes you completely dependent on others for your daily needs (for example, eating, bathing, toileting).
  4. If you are confined to bed and need a breathing machine for the rest of your life.
  5. If you have pain or other severe symptoms that cannot be relieved.
  6. If you have a condition that will cause you to die very soon, even with life-sustaining treatments.
What are some examples of the medical treatments about which I can state my choices on my Living Will within my Advance Directive?
  1. CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation)
  2. Breathing machine (mechanical ventilation)
  3. Kidney dialysis
  4. Feeding tubes (artificial nutrition and hydration)
  5. Medicines to fight infection (antibiotics)
  6. Cardioversion (electric shock to restart heart)
  7. Surgical procedures, operations
  8. Diagnostic tests
  9. Intravenous (IV) line
  10. Chemotherapy and/or radiation
Additionally, there is a section in the Living Will where you can write any other additional preferences about your health care that are important to you and that are not described any where else in the document.  These may include your preferences about how you would like to be cared for.  For example, you might have clear opinions about whether you would want a particular treatment (for example, a feeding tube, blood transfusions or medications to maintain or stabilize your blood pressure).  You might want to comment on treatment of pain or whether you would want life-sustaining treatments on a trial basis.  Or you might want to write about your preferences regarding treatment of mental illness.

Who should witness you signing your Advance Directive?

You should sign and date your Advance Directive in the presence of two witnesses.

The witnesses can be:
  1. Friends
  2. Neighbors
  3. Social workers
  4. Others:  Non-clinical VA employees of the Chaplain Service, Psychology Service, Medical Administrative service, Voluntary Service or Environmental Management Service may also serve as witnesses.
Once I have completed and signed an Advance Directive, what should I do with it?

You should give a copy to:
  1. Your social worker, doctor, or the clinic/ward staff (to be kept with your VA records)
  2. Your representatives in the Durable Power of Attorney for Healthcare
  3. Your family
  4. Yourself.  Also keep a list of all people who have copies and keep a copy that is readily accessible
Can I revoke, cancel or change my Advance Directive?

Yes, you may change or cancel your Advance Directive at any time by telling your family, doctor, nurse, social worker, chaplain or healthcare provider.  You should review your Advance Directive periodically, especially if there are any changes in your health, to make sure it is up to date.  If you change it, be sure to tell your health care team and have them put it in your health record.  Share your new Advance Directive with your family members and loved ones.

Monday, July 5, 2010

Trying to Find Myself

Useless Information


Just the facts and nothing but the facts. Or are they?

After 68 years, I have decided to try and find myself.  Most people who do this go to Africa or some far flung primitive place.  But, I decided to do it through the library.
 
I never really found anything that held my interest except for the fourteen years Jan and I lived in Columbus, Indiana.  I was involved in the Civil Air Patrol cadet programs for teenage youth. March of Dimes dedicated to improving the health of babies by preventing birth defects, premature birth and infant mortality. Columbus East High School Business Partnership Committee; Senior Projects Judge; Career Fairs participant.  Optimist Club Oratory Judge. The Indiana Astronomical Society dedicated to the pursuit of astronomy for professionals, amateurs, students, avid sky watchers, or curious hobbyists. And probably a few other things that escape me at the moment.
 
Of course now I am retired and living in a retirement village in Farmington Hills, Michigan where our roots are. 
 
Considering I spent 21 years in the Army I have joined the American Legion  founded on four pillars: Veterans Affairs & Rehabilitation, National Security, Americanism, and Children & Youth.

Aside from that however, I have nothing.  I have gone on a quest to find something that will hold my interest without consuming all of my time. So, I started out by obtaining a library card.  That allows me to download e-books and audio books through Metro Net Online Lending Library and Farmington Community Library eContent Collection.  In addition I have accessed Project Gutenberg at http://www.gutenberg.org/

Next thing was to start browsing for any subject that might catch my interest.

Now with all the resources that I mentioned above (and these are just a few of the available e-book sites) we are talking in excess of 60,000 books.  After going through the first thousand or so, I hit "Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address-Four Score and More written by Barbara Silberdick Feinberg"

This was the first book since the "Harry Potter" series that held my interest until I completed reading it.

Then I started playing around with writing a book report. I enjoyed this so much that I do believe that I have found a new outlet to keep my mind occupied.

I labeled it "Useless Information" because although I am interested, it doesn't mean that all of my contacts that I send it to are interested. Of course they all have the option of opting out.

OK, now I have an outlet. So how do I speed up the process of searching 60,000 books to see what will snag me again? First I was searching alphabetically...didn't take long to see that this was going to be a herculean task. I thought and I thought, how does the library organize all of their books? DUH!!! Dewey Decimal System (DDS).


Here are the major categories of the DDS:


000 – Computer science, information & general works


100 – Philosophy and psychology


200 – Religion


300 – Social sciences


400 – Language


500 – Science (including mathematics)


600 – Technology


700 – Arts and recreation


800 – Literature


900 – History, geography, and biography


If you would like to drill deeper into the DDS, go to URL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dewey_Decimal_Classification


This will still be a herculean project but when you are retired and nothing but time on your hands, it will definitely keep me from being bored.  Especially when you add in going to Wal-Mart, Target, K-Mart, restaurants, walking the dog, visiting with family and on and on and on.  How can one be bored?

Thursday, July 1, 2010

Christian Views on Religious Pluralism

Christianity and other religions appear to share some elements. In a look at Christianity's relationship with other world religions, this article investigates the differences and similarities of Christianity to other religions.

Religious pluralism, a term used to describe the acceptance of all religious paths as equally valid, promoting coexistence.

Christian views on religious pluralism



Classical Christian views


Some Christians have argued that religious pluralism is an invalid or self-contradictory concept. Maximal forms of religious pluralism claim that all religions are equally true, or that one religion can be true for some and another for others. Some, but by no means all, Christians hold such pluralism to be logically impossible.[1] While Roman Catholicism, one form of Christianity, insists it is the fullest and most complete revelation of God to Man, other Christian traditions believe that God is so big there are many, varied and valid paths to God.

Calvinist Christian views

Although Calvinists believe God and the truth of God cannot be plural, they also believe that those civil ordinances of man which restrain man from evil and encourage toward good, are ordinances of God (regardless of the religion, or lack of it, of those who wield that power). Christians are obligated to be at peace with all men, as far as it is up to them, and to submit to governments for the Lord's sake, and to pray for enemies.

Calvinism is not pacifistic and Calvinists have been involved in religious wars, notably the French Wars of Religion and the English Civil War. Some of the first parts of modern Europe to practice religious tolerance had Calvinistic populations, notably the Netherlands.


Eastern Orthodox views


The Eastern Orthodox Church teaches that it is the only path that one should choose for salvation. On the other hand, the Church also teaches that no human being, by statement nor by omission of a statement, may place a limit upon God's will, who may save whomsoever it pleases Him to save.


Modern (post-Enlightenment) Christian views


In recent years, some Christian groups have become more open to religious pluralism; this has led to many cases of reconciliation between Christians and people of other faiths. The liberalization of many Seminaries and theological institutions, particularly in regards to the rejection of the notion that the Bible is an infallible document, has led to a much more human-centered and secular movement within Mainline Christian denominations, particularly in the United States. Some Mainline churches no longer hold to exclusivist views on salvation.

In recent years there has been much to note in the way of reconciliation between some Christian groups and the Jewish people. Many modern day Christians, including many Catholics and some liberal Protestants, have developed a view of the New Testament as an extended covenant; They believe that Jews are still in a valid relationship with God, and that Jews can avoid damnation and earn a heavenly reward. For these Christians, the New Testament extended God's original covenant to cover non-Jews. The article Christian-Jewish reconciliation deals with this issue in detail.

Many smaller Christian groups in the US and Canada have come into being over the last 40 years, such as "Christians for Israel". Their website says that they exist in order to "expand Christian-Jewish dialogue in the broadest sense in order to improve the relationship between Christians and Jews, but also between Church and Synagogue, emphasizing Christian repentance, the purging of anti-Jewish attitudes and the false 'Replacement' theology rampant throughout Christian teachings."

A number of large Christian groups, including the Catholic Church and several large Protestant churches, have publicly declared that they will no longer proselytize Jews.

Other Modern Christian views, including some conservative Protestants, reject the idea of the New Testament as an extended covenant, and retain the classical Christian view as described above.

Modern views specific to Catholicism


Main article: Catholic Church and ecumenism


For the Catholic Church, there has been a move at reconciliation not only with Judaism, but also Islam. The Second Vatican Council states that salvation includes others who acknowledge the same creator, and explicitly lists Muslims among those (using the term Mohammedans, which was the word commonly used among non-Muslims at the time). The official Catholic position is therefore that Jews, Muslims and Christians (including churches outside of Rome's authority) all acknowledge the same God, though Jews and Muslims have not yet received the gospel while other churches are generally considered deviant to a greater or lesser degree.

The most prominent event in the way of dialogue between religions has arguably been the 1986 Peace Prayer in Assisi to which Pope John Paul II, against considerable resistance also from within the Roman Catholic church, invited representatives of all world religions. This initiative was taken up by the Community of Sant'Egidio, who, with the support of John Paul II, organized yearly peace meetings of religious representatives. These meetings, consisting of round tables on different issues and of a common time of prayer has done much to further understanding and friendship between religious leaders and to further concrete peace initiatives. In order to avoid the reproaches of syncretism that were leveled at the 1986 Assisi meeting where the representatives of all religions held one common prayer, the follow-up meetings saw the representatives of the different religions pray in different places according to their respective traditions.

The question of whether traditional Chinese ancestor veneration, consists of worshipping a God or veneration of a saint was important to the Roman Catholic church during the Chinese Rites controversy of the early 18th century. This dispute was between the Dominicans who argued that Confucianism and Chinese folk religion was worship, and therefore incompatible with Catholicism, and the Jesuit who argued the reverse. The pope ultimately ruled in favor of the Dominicans, a decision which greatly reduced the role of Catholic missionaries in China. However, this decision was partially reversed by Pope Pius XII in 1939; after this, Chinese customs were no longer considered superstition or idolatry, but a way of honoring esteemed relatives (not entirely dissimilar to the Catholic practice of praying for the dead).

Source:  From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Saturday, June 26, 2010

Immediate Reaction to the Gettysburg Address

"There were as many people wandering around the fields...as stood around the stand listening to Everett's eloquent periods."  By the time Lincoln rose to speak, more than two hours later, they would have been even more inattentive.

Lincoln's speech did not impress Everett, Seward and Chief of Protocol Ward Lamon as one of his great speeches.  Even Lincoln was disappointed.

However Presidential Aide John Hay and John Nicolay, Private Secretary to Lincoln, said the speech was eloquent , "linking the deeds of the present to the thoughts of the future."  They insisted that "the best critics have awarded it unquestioned rank as one of the world's masterpieces in rhetorical art."  Edward Everett even praised it in a note that he sent to the President.


Democratic newspapers as would be the case today compared the dedication ceremonies to a "stage play."  "On the present occasion Lincoln acted a Clown."  One editorial argued that Lincoln was "less refined than a savage."

Republican newspapers had nothing but praise for Lincoln and his speech.  "a perfect gem; deep in feeling, compact in thought and expression." Some even said that it was a better speech than Than Edward Everett's whose was smooth and cold.  The few words from the President were from the heart.

Like American statesman Daniel Webster and Henry Clay, Lincoln regarded the Declaration of Independence of 1776 rather than the Constitution of 1787 as the foundation of American beliefs.


http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1512410


Sources: Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address

Four Score and More


Barbara Silberdick Feinberg
Twenty-First Century Books
Brookfield, Connecticut
http://www.millbrookpress.com/

Dedication Ceremony - Gettysburg National Cemetery

Edward Everett,  an American politician and educator from Massachusetts is often remembered today as the featured orator at the dedication ceremony of the National Cemetery in Gettysburg in 1863.  He held the crowds attention with "eloquent description," "polished diction," and "practiced delivery."

The Reverend Thomas H. Stockton opened the program with a prayer and praised the slain soldiers:  "As the trees are not dead, though their foliage is gone, so our heroes are not dead, though their forms have fallen. In their proper personality they are with Thee. And the spirit of their example is here."

Everett blamed the Confederacy for the war.  They claimed to be defending the rights reserved to the people and the states under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution. 

Now it was time for President Lincoln to speak.  His voice was steady but high pitched.  His Kentucky twang, with "thar" instead of "there" and "forgit" instead of "forget" may have sounded strange and unpleasant to some of his listeners. But, those in the back had no trouble hearing him.

His 272 word speech was over so quickly that a photographer failed in his attempt to record the moment for history.

Edward Everett was chosen to be main speaker because the commission questioned Abraham Lincoln's ability to speak upon such a grave and solemn occasion.   Lincoln was know to include humor and folksy stories in his public speeches so that ordinary citizens would better understand him.

Lincoln however had a national reputation as a talented speaker.  So, perhaps the commissioners were needlessly worried about his ability to speak.

Lincoln decided to go to Gettysburg to honor the nation's fallen soldiers.  It would also give him a chance to speak before widespread audience to remind them why the Civil War was being fought.  Plus, with the 1864 presidential election only a year away, here was an opportunity to rally important leaders of the Republican party.  The governors of 17 states would be present.

The reelection could not be taken for granted.  The political parties in the Northern states were split into feuding factions.  The Democrats had Copperheads who secretly supported the South. Peace Democrats, eager for a negotiated settlement and War Democrats wanting to go on fighting until the South was defeated.  (Kind of sounds familiar doesn't it?).

Republicans on the other hand, had Moderates who accepted the way the war was going, Radicals felt Lincoln was too lenient on the South and not encouraging his commanders to fight hard enough, and neglecting black civil rights.

John Forbes, a Radical Republican urged Lincoln to teach his great audience of plain people that the war was about the North against the South but, the people against the aristocrats.


Sources: Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address

Four Score and More

Barbara Silberdick Feinberg
Twenty-First Century Books
Brookfield, Connecticut

http://www.millbrookpress.com/